Photo by Roman Sokal, courtesy of Audio Crowbar Dynamics.
Having recently spent more time working on the Tape Op Gear Reviews section of this magazine, one thought keeps creeping into my mind and I need to get it out:
Forming real, useable opinions on audio gear takes a lot longer than people think. Or, maybe what I should really say is, it should take a lot longer than we usually allot time for.
You know the scenario: A new piece of recording hardware or software is out in the marketplace. Let's call it the "DynoPopper X-10" for the purpose of this article. Maybe it's a version of a hard-to-find microphone, a limiter based on the Pythagorean theorem, or a plug-in that does something that was impossible three years ago. Whatever it is, if one works in this field – or is even simply a home-recording musician – eventually somebody will ask, "What do you think of that new DynoPopper X-10?"
Remember, recording gear forums are full of comments like, "I haven't tried the DynoPopper X-10 yet, but I heard that it's not as good as the DynoPopper X-5." Or, in the case of the common scenario where a poster does have access to the device, but has nothing similar on hand to compare it to, nor the background to even understand how the device works, they're often likely to write, "I don't like it. It's a lot more complicated than my $40 DinglePlopper." Or, my favorite, "I'm not gonna buy a DynoPopper X-10 because it's overpriced." Okay, thanks for that hard information.
Over the last 26 years, I have gone through a lot of different gear at Jackpot! Recording Studio. Many items would show up, seem pretty decent for a while, and then slowly begin to reveal their faults over time. Faults that eventually resign them to the "for sale" pile, such as intermittent switches that cut out during takes, hard to comprehend faceplates, audible switching power supplies, and even simply unbalanced audio connections. Some recording tools would stick around, others would go away.